Writ petition disposed of without elaboration. All issues raised were kept open for future agitation. No substantive decision reported.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Megha 6_wp_953_2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.953 OF 2016
Shri Navnath Jagannath Tambave and Ors. ...Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
...Respondents
...
Mr. Sarang Satish Aradhye for the Petitioners. Mr. Manish Pabale, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 9.
CORAM : A.S. OKA &
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED : 13th JANUARY, 2017.
P. C. :
With the passage of time, this Petition does not survive. Accordingly, the Petition disposed of. However, all the issues raised by
the Petitioners are kept open which can be agitated by the Petitioners
in the event an occasion for doing so arises in future.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.)
Megha
1/1
Navnath Jagannath Tambave and Ors.
The State of Maharashtra
A.S. OKA
Anuja Prabhu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
