The Criminal Court dismissed the Criminal Application No.23 of 2016 because the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application.
Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
apl-23.16.odt
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.23 OF 2016
Mr. Moses Francis Chinappa … Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr. … Respondents
Mr. Ram Pandey for the Applicant. Ms. M.H. Mhatre, APP for the Respondent No.1. Ms. Nalanda Jadhav i/by Mr. N.R. Bubna for the Respondent No.2.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATE : 12th JANUARY, 2017
P.C.
1 The learned counsel appearing for the applicant after arguing the application for some time seeks permission to withdraw the application. Accordingly, application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J) (A.S. OKA, J)
1 of 1
Moses Francis Chinappa
State of Maharashtra
Anr
A.S. OKA
ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
