1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
Withdrawal of the petition allowed with liberty to take appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.9358/2016
Murlidhar Khanderao Pawar.
...Petitioner..
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
...Respondents...
.....
Shri C.R. Thorat, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri V.M. Kagne, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3.
.....
CORAM: V.M. KANADE & SANGITRAO S.PATIL,JJ.
DATE: 11.01.2017
ORDER :
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to
withdraw the petition with liberty to take out
appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum
including filing a review petition before the Maharashtra
Administrative Tribunal. The petition is allowed to be
withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(SANGITRAO S.PATIL, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.)
ndk/ c1111721.doc
Murlidhar Khanderao Pawar
The State of Maharashtra
Sangitrao S. Patil
V. M. Kanade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court