Petitioner seeking direction to State Government to decide her premature release application. The Application for Premature Release was already decided by the State Government via an order dated 4.3.2017. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as nothing survived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7. cri wp 397-17.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 397 OF 2017
Jarina Pirmohammed Shaikh .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents
.. Respondents
Appearances
Mr. D.G. Khamkar Advocate for the Petitioner Mrs. G.P. Mulekar APP for the State
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
M.S. KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : APRIL 4, 2017.
ORAL ORDER [PER SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] :
forthwith and the matter is heard finally.
IPC. The case of the petitioner is that she has completed
almost 14 years of actual imprisonment, however, her case
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2
7. cri wp 397-17.doc
for premature release has not yet been decided by the State Government. In the present petition, it is prayed that direction be given to the State Government to decide the case of the petitioner for premature release.
for premature release has been decided by the State Government by order dated 4.3.2017. She has produced the copy of the said letter which is taken on record and marked
"X colly" for identification. In this view of the matter,
nothing survives in this petition, hence, rule is discharged.
[ M.S. KARNIK, J. ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
jfoanz vkacsjdj 2 of 2
Jarina Pirmohammed Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
Anr
V.K. Tahilramani
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
