Partly allowed

Rajesh Ramling Jugdhar v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC21 Aug 2017WP/8641/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court resolved multiple writ petitions where petitioners sought to withdraw them with liberty, citing an expedited decision by the respondent Electricity Distribution Company. The court accepted the prayer for withdrawal and directed the respondent to take further steps within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw writ petitions with liberty to keep contentions open and file fresh petition if occasion arises; respondent directed to take further steps within four weeks; petitions and civil appl

Rajesh Ramling Jugdhar Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

WP No. 5290/17 & Ors.

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 5290 OF 2017 WITH

¶5

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5985 OF 2017

¶6

Amol s/o Prakash Ghode and others ... PETITIONERS

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

The State of Maharashtra and others ... RESPONDENTS

¶9

Shri A.B. Chalak, Advocate h/f. Shri S.M. Mane, Advocate for petitioners.

¶10

Shri V.S. Badakh, A.G.P. for State

¶11

Shri A.S. Bajaj, Advocate for respondent No.4

¶12

W I T H

¶13

WRIT PETITION NO. 5898 OF 2017

¶14

Abhaysingh s/o Machindra Gund

¶15

... PETITIONERS

¶16

VERSUS

¶17

The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. ... RESPONDENT

¶18

Shri S.B. Parnere, Advocate for petitioner Shri A.S. Bajaj, Advocate for respondent

¶19

W I T H

¶20

WRIT PETITION NO. 5899 OF 2017

¶21

Hanumant s/o Machindranath Jagtap and others

¶22

... PETITIONERS

¶23

VERSUS

¶24

WP No. 5290/17 & Ors.

¶25

¶26

The State of Maharashtra and others

¶27

... RESPONDENTS

¶28

Shri A.B. Chalak h/f. Shri. S.M. Mane, Advocate for petitioners Shri V.S. Badakh, A.G.P. for State Shri A.S. Bajaj, Advocate for respondent No.4

¶29

W I T H

¶30

WRIT PETITION NO. 6068 OF 2017

¶31

Tirupati s/o Madhavrao Pawar and others

¶32

... PETITIONERS

¶33

VERSUS

¶34

The State of Maharashtra and others ... RESPONDENTS

¶35

Shri A.B. Shinde, Advocate for petitioners Shri V.S. Badakh, A.G.P. for State Shri A.S. Bajaj, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 to 4.

¶36

W I T H

¶37

WRIT PETITION NO. 6469 OF 2017

¶38

Akshay s/o Ajinath Satpute

¶39

... PETITIONERS

¶40

VERSUS

¶41

The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. & anr.

¶42

... RESPONDENTS

¶43

Shri V.D. Salunke, Advocate for petitioner Shri A.S. Bajaj, Advocate for respondent No.1 Shri V.S. Badakh, A.G.P. for respondent No.2/ State

¶44

WP No. 5290/17 & Ors.

¶45

¶46

W I T H

¶47

WRIT PETITION NO. 6507 OF 2017

¶48

Shri Balaji s/o Pratap Jadhav and others

¶49

... PETITIONERS

¶50

VERSUS

¶51

The State of Maharashtra and others ... RESPONDENTS

¶52

Shri A.B. Chalak h/f. Shri S.M. Mane, Advocate for petitioners Shri V.S. Badakh, A.G.P. for State Shri A.S. Bajaj, Advocate for respondent No.4

¶53

W I T H

¶54

WRIT PETITION NO. 7151 OF 2017

¶55

Balaji s/o Kamlakar More ... PETITIONER

¶56

VERSUS

¶57

The State of Maharashtra and others ... RESPONDENTS

¶58

Shri L.H. Kawale h/f. K.J. Suryawanshi, Advocate for petitioner Shri V.S. Badakh, A.G.P. for State Shri A.S. Bajaj, Advocate for respondent No.2 to 4

¶59

W I T H

¶60

WRIT PETITION NO. 8128 OF 2017

¶61

Saurabh s/o. Deeliprao Jagtap & Ors.

¶62

... PETITIONER

¶63

VERSUS

¶64

The State of Maharashtra and others ... RESPONDENTS

¶65

WP No. 5290/17 & Ors.

¶66

¶67

Shri A.B. Chalak , Advocate for petitioner Shri V.S. Badakh, A.G.P. for State Shri A.S. Bajaj, Advocate for respondent No.4.

¶68

W I T H

¶69

WRIT PETITION NO. 8641 OF 2017

¶70

Rajesh s/o. Ramling Jugdhar

¶71

... PETITIONER

¶72

VERSUS

¶73

The State of Maharashtra and others

¶74

... RESPONDENTS

¶75

Shri V.V. Udhan, Advocate for petitioner Shri V.S. Badakh, A.G.P. for State

¶76

Shri A.S. Bajaj, Advocate for respondent No.2 & 3.

¶77

CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ.

¶78

DATED : August 21, 2017.

¶79

PER COURT :

¶80

. In view of the decision taken by

¶81

respondent/Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company

¶82

Limited dated 28^th July 2017, the learned counsel for petitioners seek leave to withdraw the petitions with liberty to keep all the contentions open and to file fresh petition if occasion arises.

¶83

The prayer is accepted.

¶84

We expect respondent/Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited to take further steps in pursuance

¶85

WP No. 5290/17 & Ors.

¶86

¶87

to the decision taken on 28^th July 2017 as expeditiously as possible, but in any case not later than four weeks from today.

¶88

With the aforesaid liberty and observations the petition is disposed of accordingly. Civil Applications, if any, are disposed of.

¶89

[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.] [SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.]

¶90

ssc/

Rajesh Ramling Jugdhar v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Ramling Jugdhar v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sitaram Dattatraya Wani Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Vinayakrao Rangnathrao Muli Died Lrs Padmabai through Gpa Gopalrao Ambadasrao Borikar Vs Pathri Municipal Council, Parbhani and Others

Vilas Prabhakar Gosavi Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Babasaheb Navnath Andhale Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Daud Sajanmiya Shah Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Janabai Raosaheb Kadam Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others