Public Interest Litigation over Wakf land construction; petitioner sought leave to withdraw petition with liberty to file fresh petition with better particulars and specific details.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.77/2017
Daud Sajanmiya Shah.
...Petitioner..
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
...Respondents...
.....
Shri S.S. Thombre, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri S.B. Yawalkar, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 4 and 6
to 9.
.....
CORAM: SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ. DATE: 21.08.2017
ORDER :
1]Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to
withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to
file a fresh petition with better particulars and
specific details about the illegal and unauthorized
construction on the Wakf land.
2]With the aforesaid liberty, the petition is allowed
to be withdrawn. No costs.
(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.) ndk/ c2181712.doc
Daud Sajanmiya Shah
State of Maharashtra
Shantanu S. Kemkar
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court