Petitioner filed a writ petition claiming non-release of pension. Upon receipt of evidence showing pension was released on 12th September 2014, the court held the petition infructuous and dismissed it without further ado.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
skc 1 18-WP-737-14.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 737 OF 2014
Smt. Aarti Ashok Rawate ..Petitioner Vs The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents
..Respondents
Mr. Tanmay Vispute i/b. Mr. M. M. Baig for Petitioner. Mr. K. R. Trivedi – AGP for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4.
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & M. S. SONAK, JJ. DATE : JUNE 20, 2017
P.C. :
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the fact that after filing of this petition the pension has been released in
favour of the petitioner, this petition has rendered infructuous. He placed on record the communication dated 12th September 2014. The same is taken on record and marked as 'X' for identification.
(M. S. SONAK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
Chandka
1/1
Smt. Aarti Ashok Rawate
The State of Maharashtra
Shantanu S. Kemkar
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
