Dismissed
Hassansab Chapperban., v. State of Goa, Thr. Its Chief Secretary and 2 Ors.
Bombay HCWP/858/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Andreza
wp858-17dt27-11-17
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 858 OF 2017
Hassansab Chapperban
Versus
...Petitioner
1. State of Goa & Ors…Respondents
Mr. Vibhav Rajiv Amonkar, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Ms Neha Kholkar, Additional Government Advocate for the
Respondents.
Coram : The Chief Justice & N. M. Jamdar, J Date: 27th November 2017
PC:-
1. Apparently, the Petitioner sought for electricity supply from his residential premises to the premises he is running an Angadwadi which is admittedly all together a different premises. Since such extension/benefit cannot be accepted as they are two different premises, the Petitioner admits and submits that a fresh application will be made for electricity supply to Angadwadi with all necessary documents within two weeks from today. The same shall be disposed of on merits within four weeks thereafter.
2. Placing these submissions on record, the Petition is disposed of.
N. M. Jamdar, J.
The Chief Justice
Hassansab Chapperban
State of Goa
The Chief Justice
N. M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court