COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL…
Leave to delete Appellant No.2(a) from the array of parties is granted; application disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 685 OF 2017 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 125 OF 2011
SHRI. SAGUN BABULI NAIK AND ANR.,
... Applicants
Versus
SHRI. KANTU NILU NAIK (DECEASED), THROUGH LRS. AND ANR.,
... Respondents
Mr. A. Shirodkar, Advocate for the Applicants. Ms. S. Bhobe, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1(a) to (d) & 2.
Coram:N. M. JAMDAR, J.
Date:24th November 2017
P.C.
The learned counsel for the Applicants states that Appellant No.2(a) has expired and his heirs are already on record as Appellant No.2(b) to 2(h). Statement is accepted. Leave to delete Appellant No.2(a) from the array of parties is granted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.
N. M. JAMDAR, J.
at*
Shri. Sagun Babuli Naik
Shri. Kantu Nilu Naik (Deceased)
N. M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
