Dnyaneshwar Sudamrao Tanpure v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp790.14
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.790 OF 2014
Dnyaneshwar s/o Sudamrao Tanpure
..PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Mah. & ors.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr S.P. Koli, Advocate holding for Mr S.T. Veer, Advocate for petitioner; Mr A.P. Basarkar, A.G.P. for respondents no.1 to 7; Mr B.B. Bhise, Advocate holding for Mr D.J. Choudhari, Advocate for respondent no.8
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : 2nd November, 2017
ORAL ORDER:
Learned Counsel for respective parties are in agreement that the petition has rendered infructuous. Petition stands dismissed accordingly.
(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
amj
Dnyaneshwar s/o Sudamrao Tanpure
The State of Maharashtra
Nitins Ambekar Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court