The court allowed condonation of a 360-day delay in bringing legal representatives of respondent no.2 on record. The applicant was directed to amend papers and file the paper-book within six months.
Delay of 360 days in bringing legal representatives of respondent no.2 on record is condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca2703.12
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2703 OF 2012 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.543 OF 1999
Jijabai w/o Rama Bhutkar
..APPLICANT
VERSUS
Rama s/o Sambhaji Khillare and ors.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr Raghvendra Bhise, Advocate holding for Mr S.V. Natu, Advocate for applicant;
Mr P.S. Agrawal, advocate for respondent no.2 (23)
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : 1st November, 2017
ORAL ORDER:
This is an application for condonation of delay of 360 days caused in bringing legal representatives of respondent no.2 on record.
ca2703.12
(2)
(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
amj
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a delay of 360 days in bringing legal representatives on record should be condoned.
Jijabai w/o Rama Bhutkar
Rama s/o Sambhaji Khillare
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
