This order dismisses Writ Petitions 781 and 782 of 2003 for default due to the non-appearance of the petitioner and its advocate, despite an adjournment to today for dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssk 1/1 WP 781 aw 782/03-16/2/17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 781 of 2003 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 782 of 2003
M/s. Sarawagi Synthchem (I) Pvt. Ltd. … Petitioner vs.
The State of Maharashtra & ors. … Respondents
None for the petitioner. Ms. N. S. Jain, A.P.P. for the State/respondent no.1.
Coram : Smt. R. P. SondurBaldota, J. Date : 16th February, 2017
P.C. :
Though the petitions are adjourned to today for dismissal, the petitioner and it's advocate are absent. The petitions are dismissed for default.
[Smt. R. P. SondurBaldota, J.]
M/s. Sarawagi Synthchem (I) Pvt. Ltd.
The State of Maharashtra
R. P. SondurBaldota
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
