The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous on the statement by the petitioner's counsel that nothing survived in the matter, and discharged the rule.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.7604 OF 2006
Ashok s/o Wamanrao Bankar ... PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & ors. ...
RESPONDENTS
Shri A.S. Kale, Advocate holding for Shri S.B. Talekar, Advocate for petitioner Shri A.R. Borulkar, A.G.P. for State Shri Rajendra Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent No.5
CORAM: R.D. DHANUKA AND SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ. DATED: 22nd August, 2017.
ORAL ORDER
(SUNIL K. KOTWAL) (R.D. DHANUKA) JUDGE JUDGE
fmp/
Ashok s/o Wamanrao Bankar
State of Maharashtra
R.D. DHANUKA
SUNIL K. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
