This is a writ petition heard in the absence of the petitioners. The High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad dismissed the petition for default without substantive engagement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP 7164/06
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.7164/2006
Anandmai Sevashram, Kautha (Old)
Tq. & Dist.Nanded, through its
Secretary & another.
...Petitioners..
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
...Respondents...
None present for petitioners.
Shri Y.G. Gujarathi, AGP for respondent nos.1 & 2.
S.B. Pulkundwar, Advocate for respondent no.3.
CORAM: R.D. DHANUKA & SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ. DATE: 09.10.2017
ORDER :
This matter was on Board on 11.9.2017 and 26.9.2017
when none appeared for the petitioners. The matter is
placed on Board for dismissal today. None appears for
the petitioners today also. The writ petition is
dismissed for default. Rule is discharged. Interim
relief, if any, stands vacated. No order as to costs.
(SUNIL K. KOTWAL, J.) (R.D. DHANUKA, J.)
ndk/ c910173.doc
Anandmai Sevashram
The State of Maharashtra
R.D. DHANUKA
SUNIL K. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court