The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No.1942/2012 as infructuous based on counsel's representation of subsequent events, disposing of pending civil applications.
The writ petition and pending civil applications were dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP 1942/12
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.1942/2012
Tukaram Rangrao Kadam & others.
...Petitioners..
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & another.
...Respondents...
.....
Shri K.C. Sant, Advocate for petitioners.
Shri Y.G. Gujarathi, AGP for respondent nos.1 & 2.
.....
CORAM: R.D. DHANUKA &
SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE: 09.10.2017
ORDER :
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that in view of subsequent events, this petition has become infructuous . The statement is accepted. The writ
petition is dismissed as infructuous . Pending civil applications in this writ petition thus do not survive and are accordingly disposed of.
(SUNIL K. KOTWAL, J.) (R.D. DHANUKA, J.)
ndk/ c9101710.doc
Tukaram Rangrao Kadam & others
The State of Maharashtra
R.D. Dhanuka
Sunil K. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court