Petitioner's advocate filed a motion stating the writ petition has become infructuous and sought leave to withdraw. The Bench dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the Petition was granted and the Petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25.wpl.13257.2017.doc
dik
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 13257 OF 2017
Ms Sundari Thakur ...Petitioner
vs
State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents.
Mr Lokesh D. Zade for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents.
CORAM : B.P.COLABAWALLA, J. JUNE 23, 2017.
P.C. :
Learned advocate appearing for the Petitioner states
that he has written instructions from the Petitioner that the
Petition has become infructuous, and therefore, seeks leave to withdraw the Petition.
2 In view of the aforesaid statement, the Writ Petition is
dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
( B.P.COLABAWALLA,J.)
Pg 1 of 1
Ms Sundari Thakur
State of Maharashtra
B.P. COLABAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
