Plaintiff sought leave to withdraw the suit. The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed the suit as withdrawn and disposed of the accompanying notice of motion and chamber summons.
Suit dismissed as withdrawn with refund of court fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902.s.162.2016.doc
dik
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 162 OF 2016
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2202 of 2016
AND
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 365 of 2017
IN
SUIT NO. 162 OF 2016
Harischandra Amarnath Puri
...Plaintiff
vs
Vijay Kumar Amarnath Puri & Ors. ...Defendants.
Mr Vivek Kantawala i/b Vivek Kantawala & Co. for the Plaintiff. Mr P.Y.Shankar for Defendant No.1
Mr Amit Kakri i/b Little & Co. for Defendant Nos. 2 and 4. Mr Hrushi Narvekar a/w Ms Shaheda M. i/b Bharucha & Partners for Defendant No.3
Mr Karl Tamboly i/b Arun Panickar for Defendant No.5.
CORAM : B.P.COLABAWALLA, J. JUNE 22, 2017.
P.C. :
Mr Kantawala, learned advocate for the Plaintiff, on
instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this suit to pursue other
legal remedies that may be available to his client in law.
2 In view of the aforesaid statement, the suit is
Pg 1 of 2
902.s.162.2016.doc
dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of court fees in accordance
with rules. In view of withdrawal of the suit, nothing survives in Notice of Motion No.2202 of 2016 and Chamber Summons No. 365 of 2017 and the same are disposed of accordingly.
( B.P.COLABAWALLA,J.)
Pg 2 of 2
B.P.Colabawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
