The High Court of Judicature at Aurangabad directed the State to dispose of the petitioner's review application within six months and dismissed the writ petition.
Direction to respondent to decide review application within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
wp6920.17.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 6920 OF 2017
Sominath s/o Trimbak Rahane
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil with Mr. M.P. Tripathi, advocates for petitioner. Ms. S.S. Raut, A.G.P. for respondents 1 to 4.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
S.M. GAVHANE, JJ. DATE : 8th AUGUST, 2017
PER COURT:
This petition can be disposed of by directing respondent no. 1 to take decision on the review application bearing no. 2014/CN 40/J-7 presented by petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from today, if the same has already not been decided and, it is accordingly directed. Writ petition stands disposed of.
( S.M. GAVHANE ) ( R.M.BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should direct the respondent to expedite the decision on the review application.
Sominath s/o Trimbak Rahane
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
S.M. Gavhane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
