The court disposed of the contempt petition after counsels informed that respondents had complied with directions, rendering the grievance inoperative.
Notices issued earlier stand recalled. Contempt petition stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp801.16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 801 OF 2016 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 202 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3613 OF 2011
Madhavrao s/o Sambhaji Birajdar & others
Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr. V.D. Gunale, advocate for petitioners. Mr. S.G. Karlekar, A.G.P. for respondent no. 1. Mr. S.G. Sangale, advocate for respondent no. 3.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE & S.M. GAVHANE, JJ. DATE : 8th AUGUST, 2017
PER COURT:
Learned counsel for petitioners, states on instructions that respondents have complied with the directions issued by this court and, as such, the grievance raised in the petition does not survive. Contempt petition as such stands disposed of. Notices issued earlier stand recalled.
( S.M. GAVHANE ) ( R.M.BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
Madhavrao s/o Sambhaji Birajdar & others
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
S.M. Gavhane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
