The Bombay High Court in Criminal Writ Petition No. 63 of 2014 disposed of a petition seeking quashing of the FIR. The court observed that a chargesheet had been filed during the pendency of the petition, rendering the prayer unnecessary. The remedies on merits were kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
33 cri wp 63 of 2014.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 63 OF 2014
Arif Amir Shaikh
..Petitioner
v/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
..Respondents
Mr. Sandeep Mahadik i/b. Mr. Manoj Kumar Upadhyay for the Petitioner. Mr. K.V.Saste, APP for the Respondent No.1.
CORAM : A.S.OKA & ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. DATED : 20TH MARCH, 2017
P.C.
Chargesheet has been filed. This fact is confirmed by the learned
Counsel appearing for the Petitioner. Hence, this petition where the prayer is for quashing the First Information Report need not be entertained. Accordingly, the same is disposed of. However, remedy of the Petitioner is kept open. All contentions on merits are kept open.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (A.S.OKA, J.)
1 of 1
pps
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to entertain a petition seeking quashing of the First Information Report.
Arif Amir Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
A.S.OKA
ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
