Single order allowing a criminal application for restoration based on averments in paragraphs (7) and (8) of the application in case of Surendran Nair against the State of Maharashtra.
Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) of the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15 (i) appw 110-17.doc
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2017 IN
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 188 OF 2015
Surendran Nair
..Applicant
v/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
..Respondents
Mr. Jaydeep D. Mane for the Applicant Mr. K.V.Saste, APP for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr.Ritesh Thobde for the Respondent No.3.
CORAM : A.S.OKA & ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. DATED : 20TH MARCH, 2017
P.C.
learned APP for the first and the second Respondents and the learned Counsel appearing for the third Respondent. In view of the averments made in paragraph (7) and (8) of the application, a case
for restoration is made out. Accordingly, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (A.S.OKA, J.)
1 of 1
pps
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a case for restoration is made out on the averments in paragraphs (7) and (8) of the application.
Surendran Nair
State of Maharashtra
Respondent No.2
Respondent No.3
A.S. OKA
Anuja Prabhu Desai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
