The court disposed of two writ petitions after the respondent Establishment Officer sent a letter stating the petitioner had no objection to their disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
947 WRIT PETITION NO. 6155 OF 2013
SITARAM SHANKAR GAIKWAD VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
… WITH WP/6145/2013
DIGAMBAR MANIKRAO SHAHAPURWAD VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS.
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr Palodkar Deodatt P. AGP for Respondents: Mr S G Karlekar Advocate for Respondents 2,3 : Mr A P Bhandari
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & V.K. JADHAV, JJ. Dated: January 27, 2017
PER COURT :-
( V.K. JADHAV, J. ) ( S.S. SHINDE, J. )
...
aaa/-
SITARAM SHANKAR GAIKWAD
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
DIGAMBAR MANIKRAO SHAHAPURWAD
S.S. SHINDE
V.K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
