This short order disposed of a writ petition by directing the respondent Committee to decide the petitioner's Tribe Claim within three months and stayed adverse action pending the decision.
Direction to respondent Committee to decide Tribe Claim within three months; stay on adverse action pending decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP 1696.2016.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1696 OF 2016
CHINMAY GAJANAN CHAVAN
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr A B Chalak h/f Talekar S.B AGP for Respondents: Mrs P V Diggikar Advocate for Respondent 4 : Mr Bhandari Anand P.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & V.K. JADHAV, JJ. Dated: January 27, 2017
PER COURT :-
the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, however, within a period of THREE MONTHS from today. Till the tribe claim of the petitioner is decided by respondent no.2, no adverse action should be initiated/taken
2 WP 1696.2016.odt
against the petitioner on the ground that, he has not submitted tribe validity certificate. However, we make it clear that, interim relief granted earlier or protection granted today will be subject to outcome of the proceeding pending before the respondent no.2Committee.
3. Writ Petition accordingly disposed of.
( V.K. JADHAV, J. ) ( S.S. SHINDE, J. )
...
aaa/-
Chinmay Gajanan Chavan
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
V.K. JadHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
