The High Court at Aurangabad dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn by the learned counsel, granting liberty to initiate proceedings against the impugned order.
Liberty to take such proceedings as are available against the impugned order was granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.5714/2017
Satyawan Bankatrao Suryawanshi.
...Petitioner..
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
...Respondents...
.....
Shri M.M. Parghane, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri M.B. Bharaswadkar, AGP for respondent nos.1 & 2.
.....
CORAM: M.S. SANKLECHA, J.
DATE: 27.04.2017
ORDER :
Mr.Parghane, learned counsel for the petitioner,
seeks to withdraw this petition. However, he seeks
liberty to take such proceedings against the impugned
order as are available to the petitioner in law. Liberty
as prayed for is granted. The petition is dismissed as
withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
ndk/ c274177.doc
Satyawan Bankatrao Suryawanshi
The State of Maharashtra
M.S. Sanklecha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court