After examining the matter, I find that there is an audacious attempt on the part of the petitioner/ defendant to subvert the authority of the Court. By the order passed on 1st February, 2011, the trial Court recorded that the plaintiff has prima-facie proved that he is in possession of the suit field and restrained the defendant from disturbing the possession of the plaintiff over the suit field till disposal of the civil suit. This order was challenged by the defendant in Misc. Civil Appeal no. 8 of 2011 which was dismissed on 23rd February, 2011. The defendant had filed Writ Petition No. 1347 of 2011 which is dismissed on 31st March, 2011. Though the order of temporary injunction, which is maintained up to this Court, is operating since 1st February, 2011 and this Court while dismissing the Writ Petition No. 1347 of 2011 has recorded that the findings of the subordinate Courts that the plaintiff is in possession of the suit field are based on proper appreciation of the documents on record, the petitioner/ defendant has shown audacity to contend that he continues in possession of the suit field since 2011.
