In Writ Petition No. 4885 of 2017, the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad disposed of the petition and a pending civil application as infructuous based on counsel's instruction.
Petition and pending civil application disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
wp4885.17.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 4885 OF 2017
Sharad s/o Vishnu Gokhale
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr. N.V. Gaware, advocate for petitioner. Mr. A.V. Deshmukh, A.G.P. for respondent no. 1.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
S.M. GAVHANE, JJ. DATE : 10th AUGUST, 2017
PER COURT:
Learned counsel for petitioner, on instructions, states that by passage of time, the petition is rendered infructuous. Writ petition as such stands disposed of having been rendered infructuous.
Pending civil application, if any, does not survive and stands disposed of.
( S.M. GAVHANE ) ( R.M.BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
( R.M.BORDE )
dyb
Sharad s/o Vishnu Gokhale
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
S.M. Gavhane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
