Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner and advocate were absent despite multiple returnable dates and no attempt to seek relief since 2013.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ASWP4628.13.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4628 OF 2013
Shri Rocky Gopal Vekhande … Petitioner
Vs
1. The Commissioner, Greater Mumbai & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. Prashant Jadhav for the Petitioner.
Ms. Sushma Bhende, AGP, for the Respondent No.5.
CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.
THURSDAY, 23RD MARCH, 2017
P.C. :
1 This writ petition has been filed in this Court on 30 th March, 2013. The returnable date for admission was 8 th July, 2013. From that date, beyond seeking adjournments, no attempt has been made to seek any relief in terms of the prayers in the writ petition. Today also, when the petition is called out with the same description on the Board, both the petitioners and their advocate are absent. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution.
B.P. COLABAWALLA, J. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
SRP 1/1
Shri Rocky Gopal Vekhande
The Commissioner, Greater Mumbai
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
B.P. COLABAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
