Petitioner sought leave to withdraw her writ petition. The court granted leave to withdraw and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive legal issue was adjudicated.
Leave granted to withdraw the writ petition and the petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
903 WRIT PETITION NO. 4168 OF 2017
PRERNA SAMSHER WARPUDKAR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Salunke Sudarshan J
AGP for Respondents State: Mr. S. B. Joshi
Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. Shelke Shivaji T.
CORAM: R. M. BORDE
K. L. WADANE, JJ.
DATE:
29th March, 2017
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on
instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
Leave granted. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
JPC
1/1
Prerna Samsher Warpudkar
The State of Maharashtra
R. M. Borde
K. L. Wadane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court