Allowed

Amol Iresh Annamwar v. Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee Aurangabad through Its Member Secretary and Others

Bombay HC29 Mar 2017WP/4092/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, an ST student, was barred from MBBS exams due to pending ST certificate validation. Court directed the Committee to decide within eight months and allowed petitioner to appear for interim.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to appear for 1st Year MBBS examination; Committee directed to decide validation proposal within eight months.

Amol Iresh Annamwar Vs Scheduled Tribe Certificate… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

902.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

902 WRIT PETITION NO. 4092 OF 2017

¶4

AMOL IRESH ANNAMWAR

¶5

VERSUS

¶6

SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE
AURANGABAD THROUGH ITS MEMBER SECR

¶7

...

¶8

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Shinde Digambar B
Addl.GP for Respondents 1&2 State: Mrs. M. A. Deshpande
Advocate for respondent No.3: Mr. S. D. Bhosale

¶9

CORAM: R. M. BORDE
K. L. WADANE, JJ.
 DATE:29th March, 2017

¶10

ORDER:

¶11

1. The petitioner claims to belong to Mannervarlu,
Scheduled Tribe. He has been admitted to 1st Year MBBS

¶12

Degree Course in respondent No.2 College as against the
seat reserved for Scheduled Tribe category. On account

¶13

of failure of the petitioner to submit validation
certificate, he has been informed by the College that
he would not be permitted to appear for the 1st Year
MBBS Degree Course Examination.

¶14

2. The petitioner states that the proposal tendered

¶15

by him to the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny
Committee for grant of validation certificate is
pending consideration.

¶16

3. In the facts and circumstance of the case, this

¶17

1/2

¶18

902.odt

¶19

petition can be disposed of by directing respondent
No.1 Committee to take decision on the proposal
tendered by the petitioner for grant of validation
certificate, in accordance with law, as expeditiously
as possible, preferably within eight months from today
and it is accordingly directed.

¶20

4. In the meanwhile, respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are
directed to permit the petitioner to appear for 1st
Year MBBS Degree Course Examination and shall accept
the examination form of the petitioner.

¶21

5. With the directions as above, writ petition is
disposed of.

¶22

6. Parties to act upon authenticated copy of the

¶23

order.

¶24

(K. L. WADANE, J.) (R. M. BORDE, J. )

¶25

JPC

¶26

2/2

Amol Iresh Annamwar v. Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee Aurangabad through Its Member Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amol Iresh Annamwar v. Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee Aurangabad through Its Member Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Champalal Bhutada and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Syed Moinoddin Khutuboddin and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Poonam Sandeep Ghongade Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Balaji Sand Suppliers through Its Proprietor Satish Dnyandev Waghole Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Savita Jyotiram Kore Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Prerna Samsher Warpudkar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others