This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 461 OF 2017 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL STAMP NO. 271 OF 2017
Haresh Bhadra .. Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr. Gawrav Parkar a/w Mr.Lokesh Jain i/b DSK Legal, for Applicant.
Mr.H.J.Dedia, APP for State.
CORAM : SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI &
M.S.KARNIK, JJ.
03rd APRIL, 2017
P.C. :
caused in filing Appeal against the order dated 14/12/2016 passed by MPID Court, Mumbai in M.A. No. 399 of 2016. In
1/2
view of the averments in the application and in the interest of justice, we are of the view that delay deserves to be condoned. Accordingly delay is condoned.
( M.S.KARNIK, J.)
(SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.)
2/2
Haresh Bhadra
State of Maharashtra
V.K.TAHILRAMANI
M.S.KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
