The High Court in Writ Petition No. 3683 of 2017 granted leave to the petitioners to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a discharge application in the Trial Court if a charge sheet is filed. Writ is dismissed as withdrawn, merits not examined.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
62 wp 3683.17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3683 OF 2017
Shehzad Hanif Kutchi and anr. Versus
The State of Maharashtra and anr.
..Petitioners
..Respondents
Mr. Kamran Shaikh i/b. Mr. Rajendra J. Rathod, advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. V. B. Konde-Deshmukh, APP for the State.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKARJOSHI, J J.
DATE : 30th OCTOBER, 2017.
P. C. :
Mr. Shaikh, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file discharge application in the event charge sheet is filed in the Trial Court. Leave with liberty as prayed for, is granted. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
[DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]
Shubhada S Kadam 1/1
Shehzad Hanif Kutchi
The State of Maharashtra
Ranjit More
Shalini Phansalkar Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
