The High Court granted leave to the petitioner to withdraw Writ Petition No. 125 of 2016, and the petition was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the writ petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
34 wp 125.16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 125 OF 2016
Chetan Krishnadas Gujar Versus The State of Maharashtra
..Petitioner ..Respondent
Mr. Anand Subhash Shalgaonkar, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. R. Shinde, APP for the State.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKARJOSHI, J J.
DATE : 30th OCTOBER, 2017.
P. C. :
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Leave as prayed for, is granted. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
[DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]
Shubhada S Kadam 1/1
Chetan Krishnadas Gujar
The State of Maharashtra
Ranjit More
Shalini PhansalkarJoshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
