No commonอยู่. The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 323 of 1989 for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on the final hearing date and the earlier order remains uncomplied.
Petition dismissed; Rule discharged with no orders as to cost.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-323.89.odt
pmw
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.323 OF 1989
Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
None for the Petitioner.
CORAM : A.S. OKA &
RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATE : 18th AUGUST, 2017
P.C.
the Petition is shown under the caption of “Dismissal”. Hence, we dismiss the Petition for non-
prosecution. Rule is discharged with no orders as to cost.
(RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J) (A.S. OKA, J)
1 of 1
Petitioner
Respondent
Riyaz I. Chagla
A. S. Oka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
