M/S.Himatlal Jevanmal Andco., v. M.H.a.D.a.and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of Writ Petition No.117 of 1994 for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear on the hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp-117.94
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.117 OF 1994
M/s. Himatmal Javanmal and Company … Petitioner
Vs.
Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority and Ors. … Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
CORAM : A.S. OKA &
RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATE : 18th AUGUST, 2017
P.C.
1 None appears for the petitioner when the Petition is called out. Perused orders dated 20th July, 2017 and 4th August, 2017. None appeared for the petitioner on the earlier two dates. Hence, we dismiss the Petition for non-prosecution. The Petition is disposed of. Rule is discharged.
(RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J) (A.S. OKA, J)
1 of 1
M/s. Himatmal Javanmal and Company
Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority
A.S. Oka
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court