The single-judge court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous, holding that the challenge did not survive due to the passage of time and the refusal of an interim stay.
Petition disposed off as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
wp3163.00.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3163 OF 2000
Zimabai w/o Devidas Rathod
Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr.A.V.Deshmukh A.G.P. for Respondents No.1, 2 and 6.
===== CORAM : S.B.SHUKRE, J. DATE : 14th FEBRUARY, 2017
PER COURT:
None appears for petitioner. Learned AGP is present on behalf of respondents 1, 2 and 6. Nobody is present on behalf of respondents 3, 4 and 5.
S.B.SHUKRE JUDGE
dyb
Zimabai w/o Devidas Rathod
State of Maharashtra
S.B. Shukre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
