The High Court at Aurangabad held that the writ petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time and disposed of the matter.
The petition stands disposed of as being rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp267.14.doc
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.267 OF 2014
Sow.Sangita w/o Rajkumar Todkar and others
Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mrs.M.A.Kulkarni, advocate for the petitioners. Mr.A.V.Deshmukh, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. S.N.Lele Yelwatkar, advocate for respondents no. 5, 10 and 11.
=====
CORAM : S.B.SHUKRE, J. DATE : 14th FEBRUARY, 2017
PER COURT:
S.B.SHUKRE
JUDGE
dyb
Sow.Sangita w/o Rajkumar Todkar and others
The State of Maharashtra & others
S.B. Shukre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
