Writ petition allowed by leave to withdraw upon respondent's commitment to align with a previous order. Petition disposed with liberty. No costs awarded.
Petitioner allowed leave to withdraw the petition; petition disposed of with liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 282 OF 2017
... Petitioner
MR. NAZARETH D'MELLO., ... Petitioner Versus MAMLATDAR OF TISWADI TALUKA., ... Respondent
Shri Arjun F. Naik, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri D.Shirodkar, AGA for the respondent.
Coram:ANOOP V. MOHTA & NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ.
Date:21st March, 2017
FINAL ORDER:
Shri D.Shirodkar, learned AGA appearing for the respondent makes statement, on instructions of Ms. Sapna Banodkar, Mamlatdar (Tiswadi) that they will follow and take steps as ordered on 12th January, 2017 in Writ Petition No.118/2016 and proceed accordingly.
In view of this, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition. Leave granted. The petition is accordingly disposed of with liberty. No costs.
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.
ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
mukund
NAZARETH D'MELLO
MAMLATDAR OF TISWADI TALUKA
ANOOP V. MOHTA
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
