This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA REFERENCE UNDER INCOME TAX ACT NO. 15 OF 2016
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KARNATAKA-I BANGALORE. Versus GOA DAMAN AND DIU, INDUSTRIAL DEV. CORPN. PANAJI.
... Applicant
... Respondent
Mr. K. Arvind, Central Govt. Standing Counsel for the applicant.
Coram:ANOOP V. MOHTA & NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ.
Date:20th March, 2017
Final Order :
Mr. K. Arvind, learned Counsel appearing for the applicant, on instructions, and specifically referring to Circular No.21/2015 dated 10 December 2015 submits that the applicant is not pressing the reference. The learned Counsel also submits that based on the same circular, some other similarly situated references have already been disposed of.
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.
ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
ssm.
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Karnataka-I Bangalore
Goa Daman And Diu Industrial Dev. Corpn. Panaji
Anoop V. Mohta
Nutan D. Sardessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
