The High Court at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench deemed the recurrence in the petition as having been raised earlier. Holding that the writ petition was devoid of any substance, the court disposed of it consciously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp2644.17
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2644 OF 2017
KAWLE ROADLINES THROUGH IT PROPRIETOR APPARAO
KHANDOJIRAO KAWLE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AD OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Pathan Hamzakhan I.
AGP for Respondents : Mr. A.S.Shinde
.....
CORAM: R.M.BORDE AND K.L.WADANE, JJ.
DATED: 3rd May, 2017
O R D E R :
The grievance raised in the instant
petition shall be deemed to have been taken up for
consideration in earlier petition presented by the
petitioner being Writ Petition No. 357 of 2017
disposed of on 16.2.2017. It would not be open
for the petitioner to raise the questions which
ought to have been raised in earlier round of
litigation.
2.The Writ Petition is devoid of any
substance, and hence, stands disposed of.
(K.L.WADANE, J.) (R.M.BORDE, J.)
dbm/wp2644.17
Kawle Roadlines Through It Proprietor Apparao Khandojirao Kawle
The State of Maharashtra And Others
R.M. Borde
K.L. Wadane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court