The Court disposed of two writ petitions covered by a previous decision in W.P. No. 3596 of 2016, holding the grievances squarely covered without further adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp2923.17.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2923 OF 2017
Kantilal s/o Pandharinath Bhukan & others Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr. B.T. Bodkhe, advocate for the petitioners. Mr. P.S. Pawar, A.G.P. for Respondents 1 and 2.
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2932 OF 2017 Mohan Suryabhan Anarase & others Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr. B.T. Bodkhe, advocate for the petitioners. Mr. P.S. Pawar, A.G.P. for Respondents 1 and 2.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
K.L. WADANE, JJ. DATE : 2nd MAY, 2017
PER COURT:
wp2923.17.odt
{2}
In view of the decision rendered by this Court in W.P. No. 3596 of 2016 on 19.07.2016, grievance raised by the petitioners, in the instant petition, is squarely covered.
Writ Petition is, therefore, disposed of in terms of the order passed in the aforesaid writ petition.
( K. L. WADANE ) ( R.M.BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P. No. 3596 of 2016Referred¶12
Kantilal s/o Pandharinath Bhukan & others
The State of Maharashtra & others
Mohan Suryabhan Anarase & others
R.M. Borde
K.L. Wadane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
