The High Court of Judicature at Bombay declined to entertain a writ petition seeking to quash the First Information Report, noting that the chargesheet had already been filed. Remedies were kept open, and the petition was disposed of without allowing the quashing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
34 wp 264-15.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 264 OF 2015
Bhalchandra Ganpat Pagade ..Petitioner
v/s.
The Senior Inspector of Police & Ors. ..Respondents
Mr. S.B.Shetye i/b. Rahul Thakur for the Petitioner Ms. M.H.Mhatre, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : A.S.OKA & ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. DATED : 11TH JANUARY, 2017
P.C.
Hence, we decline to entertain this petition for quashing the First Information Report. However, remedies of the petitioner are kept
open. Petition is accordingly disposed of.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (A.S.OKA, J.)
1 of 1
pps
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition for quashing a First Information Report should be entertained after the filing of a chargesheet.
Bhalchandra Ganpat Pagade
The Senior Inspector of Police & Ors.
A.S. OKA
Anuja Prabhudesai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
