This order rejects the prayer for priority hearing due to pending old cases. The application for reconsideration of interim relief is dismissed as no change of circumstances exists.
Prayer for priority hearing rejected; application for reconsideration of interim relief dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15 appw 193-15.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 193 of 2015 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 4647 OF 2014
Arvind T. Parkar & Ors.
..Applicants
v/s.
Mazhar Abdul Hussain Sutarwala & Ors. ..Respondents
Mr. Ashish Sawant i/b. Manoj Mohite for the Applicant. Mr. K.V.Saste,APP for the Respondent nos.2 and 3.
CORAM : A.S.OKA & ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. DATED : 11TH JANUARY, 2017
P.C.
writ petition of the year 2014 cannot be considered as of today, as very old criminal writ petitions are pending in this court. Therefore, prayer clause (a) stands rejected.
1 of 2
pps
15 appw 193-15.doc
19th January, 2015 interim relief in terms of clause (3) of the order passed on that day has been granted. There is no change of circumstances brought on record requiring reconsideration of the interim relief. Hence, application is rejected.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (A.S.OKA, J.)
2 of 2
pps
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant priority hearing to the old writ petition.
Whether to reconsider interim relief granted on interim application.
Disposal of Criminal Appeal No. 193 of 2015.
Arvind T. Parkar & Ors.
Mazhar Abdul Hussain Sutarwala & Ors.
AS Oka
Anuja Prabhu Dessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
