Petitioners sought liberty to withdraw the writ petition to approach the Panchayat Secretary and Block Development Officer instead. The court granted permission to withdraw the petition accordingly.
Permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach Panchayat Secretary and Block Development Officer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 239 OF 2017
... Petitioners
MR. SHAILESH PAGI AND 2 ORS., ... Petitioners Versus STATE OF GOA, THR. CHIEF SECRETARY AND 5 ORS., ... Respondents
Adv. Dharmanand R Vernekar for the Petitioners. Mr. Pravin N. Faldessai, Addl. Government Advocate For Respondent no.1
Coram:ANOOP V. MOHTA & NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ. Date:22nd March, 2017
Order:
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instructions, in view of the position of law seeks permission to withdraw the present petition to invoke appropriate remedy by moving an application before the Panchayat Secretary and the Block Development Officer. Petition disposed of accordingly with liberty.
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.
ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
ap/-
M. Shailesh Pagi and 2 ors.
State of Goa, Thr. Chief Secretary and 5 ors.
ANOOP V. MOHTA
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
