The High Court of Bombay at Goa disposed of Writ Petition No. 23 of 2017 as infructuous in view of subsequent developments. The petition was not allowed to proceed further.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 23 OF 2017
MRS. SUHASINI S. GOVEKAR., ... Petitioner Versus THE UNDER SECRETARY, GOVT. OF INDIA AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents
Shri Devidas J. Pangam, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri M.Amonkar, Central Government Standing Counsel for the respondent.
Coram:ANOOP V. MOHTA & NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ.
Date:14th March, 2017
P.C.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners makes statement that in view of subsequent developments, Writ Petition No.23/2017 does not survive as it has become infructuous. It is disposed off as infructuous accordingly.
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.
ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
mukund
Mrs. Suhasini S. Govekar
The Under Secretary, Govt. of India
Anoop V. Mohta
Nutan D. Sardesai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
