Petitioner applied to withdraw W.P. No. 1155 of 2016 with liberty to file fresh petition due to defects. Court disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 1155 OF 2016
SHRI V. VEERAJU (SENIOR CITIZEN)., Versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, THR. RBI AND 6 ORS.,
... Petitioner
... Respondents
Mr. Vivek Angelo Rodrigues, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. D. Lotlikar, Advocate General with Ms. P. Bhandari, Additional Government Advocate for respondent nos.4 to 7.
Coram:ANOOP V. MOHTA & C. V. BHADANG, JJ.
Date:2nd March, 2017
P.C.
The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to file fresh, in view of certain defects in the petition.
C. V. BHADANG, J.
ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
SMA
Shri V. Veeraju
Reserve Bank of India
Anoop V. Mota
C. V. Bhadang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
