Writ petitions allowed to be withdrawn, yet dismissed as withdrawn. All contentions on merits kept open for future consideration. No substantive decision rendered on the underlying subject matter.
Petitions allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as withdrawn; contentions kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
901-W.P-2176-2017
1
Shailaja
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2176 OF 2017
Mr. Sashi Gopal & Anr. ] Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ] Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2177 OF 2017 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2178 OF 2017 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2179 OF 2017 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2180 OF 2017 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2181 OF 2017
Mr. Siddharth Bhole for petitioners i/b Haresh Jagtian & Associates, for petitioners.
Mr. M.R. Tidke, A.P.P, for State-respondent No.1. Mr. Suneel D. Mogre a/w Mr. D.M. Galani, for respondent No.2.
CORAM : R.G. KETKAR, J.
DATE : 18th JULY, 2017.
P.C .
Heard Mr. Bhole, learned Counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Tidke, learned A.P.P for respondent No.1 and Mr. Mogre, learned Counsel for respondent No.2.
2 901-W.P-2176-2017
request of learned Counsel for the petitioners, matter was adjourned till today. Mr. Bhole seeks permission to withdraw the Petitions. He submits that all the contentions raised by the petitioners may be kept open.
[R.G. KETKAR, J.]
Shailaja
State of Maharashtra
R.G. KETKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
