The petitioner filed an undertaking in response to a previous order dated 07.07.2017. Upon confirmation that the undertaking complied with stipulated conditions, the undertaking was accepted, and the writ petition was disposed of as no further orders were necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPL1796_17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO.1796 OF 2017
(M/s. Manthan Development Corporation and others Vs. State of Maharashtra and others)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances,Court's orders, or directions, and Registrar's Orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Ms Rita Bhatia a/w. Ms Manisha Mohammed for Petitioners. Mr. Himanshu Takke, AGP for Respondents No.1 to 3. Ms Shirin Shaikh i/b. Raval Shah and Co. for Resp. No.4.
CORAM : R. G. KETKAR, J. DATE : 17TH JULY, 2017
P.C.:
Heard Ms Bhatia, learned Counsel for petitioners, Mr. Takke, learned AGP for respondents No.1 to 3 and Ms Shaikh, learned Counsel for respondent No.4.
Minal Parab
1/1
M/s. Manthan Development Corporation and others
State of Maharashtra and others
R. G. KETKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
