The High Court noted that regarding uncultivable land, previous grants indicated gavatpad including grass, ensuring 7/12 extract aligns with no uncultivable status, forwarding the Land Acquisition Officer's opinion, while other petitioners' contentions were dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP 2021-14.doc-4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2021 OF 2014
Supriya Shriniwas Kulkarni. ] … Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra, ] Through Ministry of Revenue & Ors. ] … Respondents
Mr. Amit Borkar for Petitioner. Mr. P. G. Sawant, AGP for State.
CORAM :- DR. MANJULA CHELLUR, C.J., & G. S. KULKARNI, J. DATE :- 15 MARCH 2017
P. C. :-
(G. S. KULKARNI, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
1 of 1
URS
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to condone the report regarding the measurement of uncultivable land as gavatpad.
Whether to accept the grounds pertaining to Section 11 benefit and partition in the present petition.
Whether to allow other contentions in the present petition which were rejected in Writ Petition No. 2018 of 2014.
Supriya Shriniwas Kulkarni
The State of Maharashtra
DR. MANJULA CHELLUR
G. S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
