Dismissed

Pramila Babasaheb Kolhe v. the State Co. Operative Election Authority Maharashtra State Pune and Others

Bombay HC6 Feb 2017WP/6/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted leave to the petitioners to withdraw the writ petitions pursuant to Section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, permitting them to pursue an alternate remedy with liberty to raise contentions.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to withdraw writs to pursue remedy under S. 91 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Writ petitions disposed of as withdrawn.

Pramila Babasaheb Kolhe Vs the State Co. Operative… — Cooperative Societies | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

Writ Petition No.5/2017 with connected petitions

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

¶4

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.5 OF 2017

¶6

Sahebrao s/o Maruti Sonawane ... PETITIONER VERSUS

¶7

The State Co-operative Election Authority and others ... RESPONDENTS

¶8

Shri P.B. Shirsath, Advocate for petitioner Shri A.V. Deshmukh, A.G.P. for State Shri R.N. Dhorde, Senior Counsel with Shri V.R. Dhorde, Advocate for respondent No.5

¶9

W I T H

¶10

WRIT PETITION NO.6 OF 2017

¶11

Sau. Pramila Babasaheb Kolhe

¶12

PETITIONER

¶13

VERSUS

¶14

The State Co-operative Election Authority and others ... RESPONDENTS

¶15

Shri P.B. Shirsath, Advocate for petitioner Shri A.V. Deshmukh, A.G.P. for State Shri R.N. Dhorde, Senior Counsel with Shri V.R. Dhorde, Advocate for respondent No.5

¶16

W I T H

¶17

Writ Petition No.5/2017 with connected petitions

¶18

¶19

WRIT PETITION NO.7 OF 2017

¶20

Sau. Pramila Babasaheb Kolhe ... VERSUS

¶21

PETITIONER

¶22

The State Co-operative Election Authority and others ... RESPONDENTS

¶23

Shri P.B. Shirsath, Advocate for petitioner Shri A.V. Deshmukh, A.G.P. for State Shri R.N. Dhorde, Senior Counsel with Shri V.R. Dhorde, Advocate for respondent No.5

¶24

W I T H

¶25

WRIT PETITION NO.8 OF 2017

¶26

Chandan Nivrutti Gosavi

¶27

... PETITIONER

¶28

VERSUS

¶29

The State Co-operative Election Authority and others ... RESPONDENTS

¶30

Shri P.B. Shirsath, Advocate for petitioner Shri A.V. Deshmukh, A.G.P. for State Shri R.N. Dhorde, Senior Counsel with Shri V.R. Dhorde, Advocate for respondent No.5

¶31

W I T H

¶32

WRIT PETITION NO.9 OF 2017

¶33

Ramdas Baban Bhavar

¶34

PETITIONER

¶35

Writ Petition No.5/2017 with connected petitions

¶36

¶37

VERSUS

¶38

The State Co-operative Election Authority and others ... RESPONDENTS

¶39

Shri P.B. Shirsath, Advocate for petitioner Shri A.V. Deshmukh, A.G.P. for State Shri R.N. Dhorde, Senior Counsel with Shri V.R. Dhorde, Advocate for respondent No.5

¶40

CORAM: S. B. SHUKRE, J. DATED: 6th February, 2017.

¶41

ORAL ORDER :

¶42

After hearing these matters for considerable length of time, learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions received by him from the petitioners, seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petitions to pursue alternate remedy available under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 with liberty to raise all the contentions and questions of fact as well as questions of law in that dispute. The leave with liberty as prayed for is granted. All contentions and questions of law and fact are kept open, to be considered on their own merits in the disputes those may be filed under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. If any such disputes are raised, the Co-operative Court shall take into

¶43

Writ Petition No.5/2017 with connected petitions

¶44

¶45

consideration the time consumed by the petitioners in prosecuting these petitions in accordance with law. Writ Petitions are disposed of as withdrawn. No costs.

¶46

( S. B. SHUKRE ) JUDGE

¶47

fmp/wp5.17

Pramila Babasaheb Kolhe v. the State Co. Operative Election Authority Maharashtra State Pune and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pramila Babasaheb Kolhe v. the State Co. Operative Election Authority Maharashtra State Pune and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dattatray Pandurang Awhad Vs Assistant Registrar Co. Operative Society Aurangabad and Others

Mohan Chintaman More Vs Returning Officer for Election to Committee of Jai Hind Co. Op. Housing Society Ltd. Dhule and Ors.

Mrudalaben Manoharlal Babaria and Others Vs M/S Chhallani Ginning and Pressing Factory through Its Partner J I Chhallani and Others

Yogeshwari Sugar Industries Ltd. through Its Chairman Ashok Hansanand Samat and Another Vs Vitthal Devrao Jogdand and Another

Yogeshwari Sugar Industries Ltd. through Its Chairman Ashok Hansanand Samat and Another Vs Mohan Vitthalrao Kulkarni and Another

Yogeshwari Sugar Industries Ltd. through Its Chairman Ashok Hansanand Samat and Another Vs Balasaheb Dagdoba Gangarde and Another