petitioner challenged returnability of nomination paper due to caste certificate attestation and alleged rule violation; court found law mandates attested not self-attested copy; rule 18 inapplicable; writ dismissed.
writ petition dismissed with costs; rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp1351.17.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1351 OF 2017
Mohan Chintaman More age 54 years, occ. Service r/o Shashi Chintan lane No. 7, Deopur Dhule, Tq. & Dist. Dhule .. PETITIONER
VERSUS
.. RESPONDENTS
Mr. M.S. Deshmukh, advocate for petitioner. Mr. V.S. Kadam, advocate for respondent no. 1. Mr. V.D. Salunke, advocate holding for Mr. S.S. Patil, advocate for respondent no. 3.
=====
wp1351.17.doc
2
CORAM : S. B. SHUKRE, J. DATE : 3rd FEBRUARY, 2017.
ORAL JUDGMENT :
wp1351.17.doc
3
( S. B. SHUKRE ) JUDGE
dyb
2 issues framed by the court
Whether acceptance of nomination paper was improper because the caste certificate filed was not a self-attested copy.
Whether restriction under rule 18 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies (Election to Committee) Rules, 2014 is applicable to the society.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohan Chintaman More
Returning Officer for election to Committee of Jai Hind Co-operative Housing Society Ltd
Jai Hind Co-operative Housing Society ltd.
Vasantrao Onkar Ishi
Naresh Ramesh Suryawanshi
S. B. SHUKRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
